Advertisement
I have been looking for someone in the SF Bay Area who does work with this kind of ink. I have found a few shops using some UV, but they admit limited experience! Thanks for any tips!!
As this usually sparks comments about this kind of ink.. please know I have researched it... info below.
Given its extensive testing of FDA approval, with absolutely no adverse reactions to it in over ten years, it is all in the proof, this ink is most likely the safest ink on the market.
Here is the bottom line:
- It contains NO phosphors
- It is NOT radio active
- It DOES NOT contain EverGlow
- It does NOT cause cancer
- It has FDA approval as a Spectral Marking [tattoo] Pigment that was developed for use in tracking [tattooing] animals and fish - and yes the same ones we eat, and has been tested and used with NO adverse reaction in humans for over 10 years.
- the florescent dye is completely safe and has NO carcinogen and is human safe and does not spread or “blow out” because the dye is contained and it never even touches the skin because of the PMMA shell.
- the white (clear) does not discolor.
- It is being sold all over the world - and is used almost everyday.
As this usually sparks comments about this kind of ink.. please know I have researched it... info below.
Given its extensive testing of FDA approval, with absolutely no adverse reactions to it in over ten years, it is all in the proof, this ink is most likely the safest ink on the market.
Here is the bottom line:
- It contains NO phosphors
- It is NOT radio active
- It DOES NOT contain EverGlow
- It does NOT cause cancer
- It has FDA approval as a Spectral Marking [tattoo] Pigment that was developed for use in tracking [tattooing] animals and fish - and yes the same ones we eat, and has been tested and used with NO adverse reaction in humans for over 10 years.
- the florescent dye is completely safe and has NO carcinogen and is human safe and does not spread or “blow out” because the dye is contained and it never even touches the skin because of the PMMA shell.
- the white (clear) does not discolor.
- It is being sold all over the world - and is used almost everyday.
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: UV - Blacklight Ink
Wed, July 9, 2008 - 2:47 AMTagging animals is NOT an artistic pursuit, and all that needs to be done is that SOME ink get in the skin in a pattern RECOGNIZABLE as numbers and letters, NOT artistic handwriting or complex artwork, which means that while this ink MAY be "the safest ink on the market, that does NOT mean it actually works for high-quality, professionally done, artistic tattooing.
In my experience- and that of several other prolific, professional, respected tattooers with whom I've spoken on this subject- it doesn't tattoo like "regular" ink, since it's NOT the same texture, nor does it exhibit the same fluid dynamics of "ground pigment in suspension", and it's a BITCH to put in the skin, and even if you can get your machine to put it in properly without turning the client into hamburger (not easy to do), it looks like shit when it's fresh AND when it's healed...... EXCEPT under UV light. While there's a lot of so-so tattooers willing to use the stuff here and there for SMALL tattoos, it's a GIMMIC that DETRACTS from the appearance of a professionally done tattoo.
Bottom line: why would any serious tattooer want to do a tattoo with his or her reputation and name behind it that ONLY looks good in the dark under blacklight?
Oh, a bunch of us OWN the stuff, since we're as curious as the next guy, and I've had my dozen small bottles for those "Ten years" you mention. But it is VERY important to me (and other professionals) that the client leave with a GOOD looking tattoo that's professionally done, artistically and mechanically sound which can be shown to the world with pride, rather than with explanations that "no, honest, it really DOES look good..... just not now".
I hope this helps.
If you want something that glows when you're out dancing under black lights, or at a rave or a party, buy some raver jewelry or clothing. It's cheaper and looks better anyway. -
-
Re: UV - Blacklight Ink
Fri, July 11, 2008 - 6:01 PMWould it be possible to use blacklight ink to add highlights to a regular design? Some sort of feature that would show up under UV but nowhere else?
uh, and that's gimmick, just sayin' -
-
Re: UV - Blacklight Ink
Sat, July 12, 2008 - 1:47 AMThank you very much for the typo correction. I usually don't miss something like that, but I guess I asked for it when I put the word in caps :-)
As for highlights, there's no real reason not to, but then again, if only the highlights show up in the club, and not the artwork of the tattoo, you might wanna think about having some large, dynamic, PROPERLY planned and drawn "tribal" work done that complements the muscle structure of some body part (back? calf? upper arm?) and then OUTline the black or grey work with the clear UV stuff........ if you insist on putting that stuff in your skin (my concern is, was, and shall remain a DEEP concern about the physics of "UV exciteability" and what the resulting impact on SURROUNDING cellular structure might be, not that the substance itself might be carcinogenic, just the process of having UV "excite" the pigment and the resulting byproduct light radiation- talk to a physics professor, preferably in a laser lab).
-
-
